The Bird-Bid

I’ve been thinking a lot about communication within families lately. My kids are still at camp, so I don’t talk to them every day except to send them cat pictures and what I hope are encouraging words via Google Hangouts. This process has provided me with an opportunity to examine how well (or not well) I do on my end of it. Frankly, and a bit uncomfortably, I admit I feel like I’m struggling, and more so as they have grown up and entered their teen years.

Family communication now is not the same as it was for me growing up. The most obvious change from back then is the widespread use of social media and the plethora of distractions we all have these days. But the uncomfortable silence, the misunderstood joke, the taciturn teen, and even the distracted “mmm-hmm” uttered while staring at something else entirely, were not invented by this generation.

Way back when, before my current family even existed as such, to help me with relationships I read some of the work of marriage and family therapist John Gottman. Gottman’s approach to relationships appeals to the scientist in me because he observes people interacting, collects data, and formulates hypotheses. He’s even got an Institute. I found his books, such as The Relationship Cure, and Why Marriages Succeed or Fail, to be a refreshing change from other popular relationship advice books of the day, such as those by John Grey of Mars/Venus fame (I was always convinced that Grey was from Uranus, but that’s just me). The downside to Gottman’s approach at that time seemed to me to be that it was so cerebral and complicated that while it looked great on paper, it was hard, at least for me, to put into practice in the moment.

I came across Gottman again recently, through this article, “Science Says Lasting Relationships Come Down to 2 Basic Traits.” It was making the rounds of the internet a while ago. And now I think I have a better idea why I’ve had so much trouble putting Gottman’s advice into practice.

Early in his career, Gottman coined the term, “bids for connection,” which are requests by one partner to another to connect emotionally. The definition is given in the article in this way:

“Throughout the day, partners would make requests for connection, what Gottman calls “bids.” For example, say that the husband is a bird enthusiast and notices a goldfinch fly across the yard. He might say to his wife, “Look at that beautiful bird outside!” He’s not just commenting on the bird here: he’s requesting a response from his wife — a sign of interest or support — hoping they’ll connect, however momentarily, over the bird.”

Okay, sure. I remember this and get it as far as it goes. But this time reading through the example, I was floored by the one-sidedness of what comes next.

“The wife now has a choice. She can respond by either “turning toward” or “turning away” from her husband, as Gottman puts it. Though the bird-bid might seem minor and silly, it can actually reveal a lot about the health of the relationship. The husband thought the bird was important enough to bring it up in conversation and the question is whether his wife recognizes and respects that.”

Now, I still think Gottman is one of the best around when it comes to this stuff. But–and this is a pretty big but–there’s a side of it that I think he simply misses, and which I think is incredibly important. In his analysis, he puts all the responsibility for the quality of the interaction on the person receiving the bid for connection and none on the bidder. Even the tagline of the article says, “it has to do with HOW PEOPLE RESPOND to their partners’ “bids”.” (Emphasis mine)

My beef is, is that the only question? Isn’t there also the wife’s side here? Maybe she’s legitimately busy with something else and he’s being inconsiderate by making her drop what she is doing and look at a bird instead. Turn it around: she thought what she was doing was important enough not to interrupt to look at a bird, and the question is whether her husband recognizes and respects that. I think that’s an equally important question.

Later in the article, the phrase “stop interrupting me, I’m reading” is characterized as “overt hostility.” Really? I think it totally depends on the context.

In the context of other research about speech, and especially gendered speech, I think Gottman’s approach here is particularly problematic. There are statistics showing that women are interrupted by men much more often than vice-versa, and interrupted more often generally. Interrupting someone can just be a style difference, but it can also be a power play or a method of control. If someone says, “stop interrupting me, I’m reading” she may just be setting a healthy boundary and trying to get some work done. It’s not fair to call that “overt hostility.”

So I think Gottman needs to look at the other side too, at the quality of the bids, not just the quality of the responses. Are the bids offered in a kind, respectful manner? Or are they obnoxious, intrusive, or controlling? Then one might be able to start to untangle what goes wrong in response.

It turns out that Gottman has written about improving the quality of bids. He even has a chapter in one of his books called “6 Bid Busters and How to Avoid Them.” But even this list doesn’t include bad timing as a “bid buster.” I think it’s a huge one. Interruptions and demands for attention and connection at bad times can feel really disrespectful.

The reason I’m thinking about this now is that I deal badly with interruptions of all types. Badly-timed interruptions cause me to lose my train of thought and to forget what I was doing. When it’s important to me,  I find the intent to be almost secondary to the fact of the interruption. It doesn’t matter how kindly it was meant, or if it was “just” a bid for connection, it still derailed me and it becomes hard for me to get back on track again. My reaction to those bids has consequences, and it does affect my personal relationships. It’s a sobering realization, but more sobering still is trying to figure out what to do about it.

How do you cope with interruptions and poorly timed bids for connection? And do you ever modify your own bids to make them more palatable to the person receiving them?


10 thoughts on “The Bird-Bid”

  1. What a wonderfully insightful post, Karen! I think you’re spot on that Gottman ignores a key aspect of bids — the fact that how people respond to them isn’t the whole issue here. There is also, as you point out, the “quality” of the bid itself.

    I think in practice, most — but not all — of us at least intuitively recognize that timing matters, and that timing varies depending on the urgency or importance of the bid. “Come see the bird you saw yesterday”, is quite different from, “OMG! I just got a promotion, a pay raise, and a corner office!” A wise partner learns when his or her partner can be respectfully interrupted and with what.

    I don’t think there are many hard and fast rules to it. Each couple largely has to work out those things for themselves, so far as I can see. For instance, a needy person who would drive most of us nuts might yet find a partner willing to happily cater to them.

    One question I have, though, is whether there’s a sort of universal threshold for the percentage of bids that must be “turned towards” in order to have a healthy relationship? That is, is it the same for everyone that, say, 80% to 85% of all bids must be turned towards for a person to be happy with their partner? While I suspect that’s not the case, and that the figure varies from one partner to another (e.g. some can live with 50%, some demand 90%), I would not be surprised if it actually turned out that humans are pretty much alike here.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I would have thought that most of us knew that timing matters, but there seems to be a surprising amount of variation. I think I am on the low end of interruption tolerance. It throws me much more than it does some others. My challenge is not to automatically interpret it as rude and inconsiderate. But I think there needs to be a corresponding consideration on the part of the other person that I’m not being rude, either, when I don’t turn toward every bid.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if we all needed, or at least appreciated, a high amount of turning towards our bids.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I love your take on this, Karen. I work at home about half the week and am constantly pushing back against such “bids” because I’m trying to concentrate and the minute the concentration is broken it takes me a bit to get back on track. I think the analysis is one-sided as well and wonder why that’s so, whether it’s a male/female thing or if it just seems that way because I’m a woman. If he would have side partner A and partner B perhaps it wouldn’t have seemed biased, but therein lies the conundrum.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I think the poem about post bird-bid make-up sex, that I posted in the comments, is interesting too in that regard. I like the idea of what the poet writes–I want them to make up–but I can’t really relate. I wonder if a woman would have written the poem differently.


  3. This is an excellent post, Karen! I know exactly what you’re talking about. And in answer to your question, there are two things I’ve gotten in the habit of doing. First, saying excuse me, do you have time for…? Second, watching my tone of voice. I’ve found if I let my voice go up at the end of a sentence so it’s almost like a Brit does, as if it’s a question, it says to someone you’re giving them a choice. How many times did I hear my mom say, “It’s not WHAT you said, it’s HOW you said it.” That’s what got her goat. Took me awhile to make those things a habit and I blow it sometimes. And when I do, I have to stop and realize that I can’t change the other person, I can only change how I respond. And sometimes that’s just to leave it and walk away. Make sense?

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Yes, I saw the poem first on your blog. I didn’t know it before. The poet doesn’t make the bird bid gendered in his telling, but I still wonder if a woman’s take might have been different.


  4. Good piece, Karen, and a great subject. There are definitely two sides to the bid-response equation, but I’d like to take the issue of family communication in a different direction.

    My younger son spent 80-some days in an outward-bound-type recovery center when he was 18, and every night there they had a structured check-in process. Everyone in his group went through a list that I don’t remember completely, but it included things like “my fears,” “something I did well today,” “something I could have done better,” “something I did for someone else,” “my dream,” “my happy to be alive and sober moment.”

    When my son completed and “graduated” from the program, as part of his plans for the future, he asked my wife and me to do the check-in process with him. We worked out a schedule and did it by phone, one day a week with me, one day a week with my wife, and one day a week with both my wife and me on the phone with him. We each went through the list, and we continued that process for about a year. Every once in a while we do it again, even though none of us remembers all the points to cover.

    My wife and I were both amazed that the idea had come from him and that it was so needed. Who ever has conversations like that with their kids? As I write this I’m thinking that my wife and I ought to resume it for ourselves.

    So my overall point is that, despite all the missed bid-and-response opportunities, a regular heartfelt emotional check-in would go a long way toward more fulfilling family communication.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yeah, family meetings always seemed like a good idea. I read a book about how to have family meetings and it suggested something like you outline here. I also found that structuring my phone calls with my parents on my end works much better than “winging it.” So I always have a calendar and a list when I check in with my parents by phone. But that kind of structure only really works well if both parties are on board with it. I’d love it if my kids or husband (or parents) came up with the idea, then maybe they’d buy into it. But right now I run into a lot of resistance, and even resentment, if I try to change anything about our family communication away from the “random bid when it’s convenient for them” model.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s